¶1 Jack Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Barry, No. CA-04-657-1 (E.D.Va. July 13, 2004). The court has also received a motion seeking to add four individuals who were not parties to this case in the district court as parties to this appeal. We deny this motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED