Smith v. Reddish’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 1998
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Myers, Receiver v. Matusek · Glidden Admx. v. Gutelius · Courtright v. Tunnicliffe · Pierce v. Perry · Jones v. Home Savings Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We hold further that the claim brought in question is a preferred claim, not limited to payment from the cash on hand in the vaults of the bank at the time it closed but that it may be paid from the whole or general funds held or controlled by the bank at the time it closed, regardless of where located. Glidden v. Gutelius, 96 Fla. 834 , 119 So. 140 , rehearing denied (Fla.) 120 So. 1 ; Meyers v. Matusek, 98 Fla. 1126 , 125 So. 360 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rackley v. Mathews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.