Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 Fla. 797

152 So 432

State Ex Rel. Rogers v. Sweat

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 23, 1934

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1934-01-23

Relies on Garrett v. Fernauld · Lamar v. Palmer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-01-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1975

8 state decisions

4019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*804 Whitfield, J.

¶1 (concurring). — The Constitution provides that “no tax shall be levied except in pursuance of law.” Section 3, Article IX.

¶2 A tax being a definite and certain pecuniary burden imposed by law upon persons or property for governmental purposes, the subject and amount or rate of the tax should be prescribed in definite, unequivocal, .express words of a duly enacted statute, otherwise there would not be a definite and certain tax levied in pursuance of law as required by the Constitution, but the tax would depend upon the demands of the collecting agencies.

¶3 A mortgage upon realty in Florida is not an estate in land, but is a written contract lien upon described land usually given to secure the payment of a debt. It is in law and in equity only a chattel property right. An excise tax may by statute be levied on the execution or the assignment of a mortgage of realty, even though an excise tax is also imposed upon the execution or the assignment of the notes or written instruments evidencing the debt secured by the mortgage. See Lamar v. Palmer, 18 Fla. 147. But a lawmaking intent to impose an excise tax upon the execution or the assignment of a written mortgage lien upon real estate should appear by the express unambiguous words of a valid statute.

¶4 Mortgages or liens are not mentioned in the paragraphs of the statute which are to be interpreted in this case except that mortgages which incorporate the certificate of indebtedness not otherwise shown in separate instruments are subject to the tax imposed upon certificates of indebtedness', thus showing an intent to tax the execution and assignments of evidence of debt but not to tax the execution or assignment of liens or mortgages.

¶5*805 In Garrett v. Fernauld, 63 Fla. 434, 57 So. 671, it was held that á written assignment of a mortgage upon land is not a conveyance or transfer of “any interest” in land covered by the' mortgage, within the meaning of the recording statute which includes any “conveyance, transfer or mortgage of real property, or of any interest therein.” See Section 5744 (3841), C. G. L.

¶6 In Florida ad valorem taxes' are not imposed upon real estate mortgages as being “an interest in land.” Mortgages on real estate are taxed as intangible personal property. See Chapter 15789, Acts of 1931.

¶7 Davis, C. J., concurs.

/113/fla/797 · .json · Public domain