113 F. Supp. 892 - Redfern v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · Cuba Railroad v. Crosby · Young v. Masci · Arnold v. Leonard · Northern Pacific Railroad v. Babcock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Plaintiff’s rights in suing herein for her alleged injuries sustained in Texas do not differ from those of any married woman residing in Texas and suing for injuries sustained in Texas. Therefore, the right of action for Plaintiff’s alleged injuries and the party, or parties, entitled to prosecute this suit for such injuries are to be, determined by the law of Texas. Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Humble, 181 U.S. 57 , 21 S.Ct. 526 , 45 L.Ed. 747 ; W. W. Clyde & Co. v. Dyess, 10 Cir., 126 F.2d 719 ; and Traglio v. Harris, 9 Cir., 104 F.2d 439 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.