Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 F. Supp. 2d 175 - Fryar v. Bissonnette

113 F. Supp. 2d 175 - Fryar v. Bissonnette’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 2007
most recently cited

7 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Chambers v. Mississippi · Michael Wayne Williams v. John Taylor Warden · Keeney v. Tamayo-Reyes · Commonwealth v. Harrington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the facts are in dispute, the federal court in habeas corpus must hold an evidentiary hearing if the habeas' applicant did not receive a full and fair evi-dentiary hearing in a state court, either at the time of the trial or in a collateral proceeding. In other words a federal evidentiary hearing is required unless the state-court trier of fact has after a full hearing reliably found the relevant facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.