Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 FSUPP2D 922 - Rodgers v. Angelone

Rodgers v. Angelone’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
May 2001
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Bagley · Coleman v. Thompson · United States v. Agurs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “his state petition ceased to be pending’ on the date of the trial court's decision,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.