State v. Heapy’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2023
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · Adams v. Williams · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Arvizu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“narrowly defined exception to the warrant requirement is that a police officer may stop an automobile and detain its occupants if that officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person stopped was engaged in criminal conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“justified on the premise that systematic and non-discriminatory seizures minimally intrude upon an individual's privacy”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“It is axiomatic that reasonable suspicion to justify a stop must relate to criminal activity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Iona. · State v. Tominiko
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.