Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Haw. 385 - State v. Davalos

State v. Davalos’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2021

7 state decisions

30200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · State v. Pinero · 39 Cal. 3d 107 - People v. Edwards · United States v. Swiderski · State v. Okumura

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal the test for the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is that applied to determine sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]lthough different language is sometimes used to describe the standard of review when the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is appealed, the test on appeal is actually identical-if there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction, the motion for judgment of acquittal was properly denied; if there was insufficient evidence, the denial of the motion was error”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “State v. Davalos, 113 Hawai#i 385, 389, 153 P.3d 456, 460 (2007) (citing State v. Okumura, 78 Hawai#i 383, 403 n.15, 894 P.2d 80 , 100 n.15 (1995) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.