State v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 423 - State v. Peterson · United States v. Hill · Greene v. Michigan Department of Corrections · State v. Taniguchi · 91 Wash. 2d 492 - State v. Alexus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] person on probation should not be allowed to benefit from not being timely seived a bench warrant issued because one or more terms and conditions of the person’s probation were violated when, but for such violation(s) of probation, the person would have been served with a motion for revocation of probation and the bench warrant would not have been necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Owens
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.