Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Idaho 337 - Wolfe v. State

Wolfe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2015

12 state decisions

501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Clark v. State · Paradis v. State · Baruth v. Gardner · Drapeau v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I.C. § 19-4904 provides that “a court-appointed attorney shall be made available to the applicant” if he is unable to pay the “expenses of representation____” However, the ineffectiveness of such counsel is not among the permissible grounds for filing another post-conviction relief application under I.C. § 19-4901. The statutory scheme is designed to deal with collateral attacks upon allegedly improper convictions and sentences, not collateral attacks upon other post-conviction proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Gee v. State
  2. “the court finds a ground ... which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original supplemental or amended application.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Nguyen v. State
  3. “ground for relief ... which for sufficient reason was not asserted or was inadequately raised in the original ... application.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Nguyen v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.