State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3122 (§ 301 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3123 (§ 301 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Smith v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the information likely to be obtained is relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.