Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Idaho 916 - Schoonover v. Bonner County

Schoonover v. Bonner County’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2020

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

8019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell · Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Irby v. Sullivan · State Ex Rel. Barney v. Hawkins · Brand S Corp. v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The average wage earner depends greatly on the regular receipt of earned wages. If unpaid, serious economic injury may result to the wage earner. The legislature also has recognized that the wage earner would not be fully compensated if he were allowed merely to recover his withheld wages because of the costs of attorney’s fees and suit. Although attorney’s fees are authorized by statute, they can not be awarded unless the wage earner recovers all that he claims. Therefore, in many cases there is a need for additional compensation. Thus, although the award of treble damages does tend to penalize the employer, it also serves to fully compensate the wage earning employee for the injury caused him by the delay he experiences in recovering his withheld wages in a court of law and the expenses connected with recovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “essentially a last-gasp theory under which a defendant who can point to no specific detrimental reliance ... may still assert that [another party is] estopped from asserting allegedly contrary positions where it would be unconscionable for them to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.