Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Idaho 933 - FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT v. Bannock County

FAIRWAY DEVELOPMENT v. Bannock County’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2009

7 state decisions

40198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 336 So. 2d 586 - Filmon v. State · Royal Parke Corp. v. Town of Essex · Merris v. Ada County · 136 Ill. App. 3d 496 - In Re Application of Cook County Collector · Miami Atlantic Development Corp. v. Blake

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certainly it cannot be said on this record that exclusive use of the market data approach based on sales of condominiums (when none have been sold for ten years) gives major consideration to the “actual and functional” use. It may not result in accurate or fair appraisals to define all other Bannock County condominiums as “similar properties” to Fairway Estates and so use the values of those properties as the basis for assessing Fairway____ Here, we hold that Fairway cannot be assessed with attention given only to its property’s classification as “condominium.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We have previously noted that assessments pursuant to an approved method of appraisal may still be arbitrary, and capricious and unreflective of market value in the actual and functional use of the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.