Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 ILLAPP 167 - Reeves & Co. v. Chandler

Reeves & Co. v. Chandler’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
August 1986
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 1986

4 state decisions

30190419101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hayes v. O'Brien · Ryan v. Hamilton · Raymond v. Hartford Fire Insurance · Union League Club v. Blymyer Ice Machine Co. · Fox v. Pierce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is apparent from the grammatical construction and arrangement of the clause in question that the words `and satisfactory' were added thereto after the preceding portion was written and as a concession to defendant in error. It may be reasonably inferred that he was determined that no opportunity should be given plaintiff in error to force the outfit upon him if he finally concluded not to take it. The words referred to were undoubtedly added to the clause at his request or suggestion and for the purpose of inducing him to sign the order." ( 113 Ill. App. 167, 171 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"`It sometimes happens that the right is fully reserved where it is the chief ground, if not the only one, that the party is determined to reserve an unqualified option, and is not willing to leave his freedom of choice exposed to any contention or subject to any contingency. He will not enter into any bargain except upon the condition of reserving the power to do what others might regard as unreasonable.'" ( 113 Ill. App. 167, 170-71 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.