Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 KAN 340 - Shmana v. Swift & Co.

Shmana v. Swift & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1937
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Molz · Forbes v. Madden · Jacobs v. Hamilton Coal & Mercantile Co. · State v. Compton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant contends that there was no finding of a permanent partial disability. The jury did find that there was a partial disability and that it would continue for eight years, which is the maximum time of payment for partial disability under the workmen’s compensation act. There was evidence by the physicians that such partial disability as plaintiff had was permanent in character, and the court properly construed the answer of the jury as being a finding of permanent partial disability.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.