Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 KAN 385 - State v. Minnick

State v. Minnick’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2000

8 state decisions

40192319301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Alderman · Shuttles v. Commonwealth · State v. Lewark · Foster v. State · Levi v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If it was admissible it was in spite of its tendency to show him guilty of another offense and not because of it.” (p. 387.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.