Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Md. App. 504 - Painter v. Painter

113 Md. App. 504 - Painter v. Painter’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2018

12 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on General Motors Corp. v. Lahocki · 42 Md. App. 421 - Colandrea v. Colandrea · Steele v. Goettee · 109 Md. App. 620 - Lemley v. Lemley · 67 Md. App. 577 - Randolph v. Randolph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Due to the seriousness of the problem of domestic violence in our society and the extreme example of domestic violence contained in this case, we commit this case to the reporter in order that the facts contained herein may be preserved as examples of the seriousness of this, all too frequent, recurring problem and to again emphasize that a woman is not required to be a homicide victim in order to establish the elements of constructive desertion.” “FACTS “The court, from the testimony and the exhibits, has determined the following facts by clear and convincing evidence. This narrative summarizes examples of respondent’s acts of violence towards his wife and children from 1978 until 1994. “Spousal Abuse”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Given the extreme and unusual factual circumstances as to violence, and given Daniel's closeness to the age of majority, the denial of visitation was not an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.