Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 MICH 209 - People v. Hiller

People v. Hiller’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 1930
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1930

8 state decisions

3018971900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kring v. State of Missouri · Medley · Blakemore v. Dolan · Goodno v. City of Oshkosh · State v. Ingersoll

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The only exceptions to the rule herein stated are where the state, enacting the new legislation has a general law, which operates as a saving clause, or where the new legislation indicates very clearly that its provisions are to apply only to offenses thereafter committed. It was doubtless competent for the legislature to continue the penalty for offenses committed under the old law, after the new law took effect, by attaching to the new law a saving clause, or by indicating in the law itself that its provisions were to attach only to offenses committed after the law became operative. * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “' “We understand the rule to be, in criminal cases, in the absence of a saving clause, that where the penalty is altered in degree, but not in kind, by increasing the punishment which may be imposed, the effect of enacting the increased penalty is to repeal the earlier provision.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.