¶1The plaintiff sued the defendant, a married woman, in justice’s court, declaring on the common counts. The bill of particulars was as follows:
Toledo. Edward Frohlich Glass Co. Detroit.
Detroit, May 15, 1895.
Sold to Charles F. Graulich, Agt.:
4 P. P. 20x68
4 P. P. 17x105
3 P. P. 62x105
IP. P. 74x105 ______________________________-_____________§201 43
Filed June 21, 1895.
W. C. Harris, Clerk.
¶2He obtained a judgment for $70. Upon the trial at circuit, the court allowed an amendment to the declaration by adding a special' count for a breach of contract in refusing to accept and pay for the items mentioned in the bill of particulars, and a verdict and judgment followed *66upon this theory solely. The amendment was made and evidence admitted against objection and exception by counsel for defendant. The case is within the rule stated, in the case of Loranger v. Davidson, 110 Mich. 605.
¶3Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered.