Brown v. Strom’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1986
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farnham v. Thompson · Heirs of Adams v. Adams · State ex rel. Martin v. Ueland · Culver v. Hardenbergh · State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The law is concerned not so much with working out an abstract and ideal harmony with respect to the limits of this dual jurisdiction (of district and probate courts) as it is with the efficient administration of practical justice.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fiske v. Lawton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.