Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 Minn. 132

Barnes v. Davis

Decided December 30, 1910

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1923

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1910-12-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

O’Brien, J.

¶1(dissenting).

¶2I am unable to satisfy myself that defendant E. W. Forbes consented to the deposit as security for the payment of the overdraft above the $600 note, and therefore dissent.

/113/minn/132 · .json · Public domain