Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 MO 21 - State ex rel. Kirtley v. Augustine

State ex rel. Kirtley v. Augustine’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
6
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2007

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

40189219001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. United States · Mimmack v. United States · State ex rel. Van Buskirk v. Boecker · People ex rel. McCune v. Board of Police for the Metropolitan Police District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[i]t is only necessary that the incumbent evince a purpose to relinquish the office; that this purpose be communicated to the proper authority, and that this resignation be accepted, either in terms, or something tantamount thereto, such as appointing a successor[.]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is well-established law that, in the absence of express statutory enactment, the authority to accept the resignation of a publie officer rests with the power to appoint a successor to fill the vacancy. The right to accept a resignation is said to be incidental to the power of appointment. 1 Dillon on Municipal Corporations (3d Ed.) § 224; Mechem on Public Offices, § 413; Van Orsdall v. Hazard, 3 Hill (N. Y.) 243; State v. Boecker, 56 Mo. 17 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.