113 N.C. App. 216 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2017
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Coffey · State v. Stager · State v. Morgan · State v. Lynch · State v. Young
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant’s constant surveillance of Ms. Welborn; defendant’s possession of two firearms; defendant’s target practice with his guns; defendant’s threatened suicide because Ms. Welborn had ended the relationship; defendant’s threats to kill Ms. Welborn; defendant’s appearance around the area on the morning of Ms. Welborn’s death; and defendant’s brand of cigarette package found on the opposite side of the road where Ms. Welborn’s vehicle came to rest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[w]hen the incidents are offered for a proper purpose, the ultimate test of admissibility is whether the incidents are sufficiently similar and not so remote in time as to be more probative than prejudicial under the balancing test of [N.C. Gen. Stat.] § 8C-1, Rule 403.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradley“Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.