113 N.C. App. 282 - Foreman v. Sholl’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2016
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kidd v. Early · 99 N.C. App. 153 - Von Ramm v. Von Ramm · 41 N.C. App. 107 - Best v. Perry · 100 N.C. App. 188 - Currin-Dillehay Building Supply, Inc. v. Frazier · 43 N.C. App. 269 - Smith v. Independent Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he appellant must appeal from each part of the judgment or order appealed from which appellant desires the appellate court to consider....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“shall designate the judgment or order from which appeal is taken....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a mistake in designating the judgment, or in designating the part appealed from if only a part is designated, should not result in loss of the appeal as long as the intent to appeal from a specific judgment can be fairly inferred from the notice and the appellee is not mislead [sic] by the mistake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.