113 N.C. App. 303 - Camalier v. Jeffries’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'n · Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. Knight · Hart v. Ivey · State v. Rivers · McGuiggan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e must look to the evidence relevant to the time Jeffries was served the alcoholic beverages and any outward manifestations which would reasonably lead defendants to know that Jeffries was under the influence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Camalier v. Jeffries“devoid of any evidence showing actual or constructive knowledge by defendants of Jeffries' alleged intoxication when alcoholic beverages were served to him at the party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Camalier v. Jeffries“any evidence regarding Jeffries' condition or appearance after he got into his car and drove out of the parking lot [as being] immaterial and irrelevant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Camalier v. Jeffries
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.