Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 N.C. App. 523 - Stanley v. Moore

113 N.C. App. 523 - Stanley v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 101 N.C. App. 450 - Spartan Leasing Inc. v. Pollard · 34 N.C. App. 503 - Love v. Pressley · Levitch v. Levitch · Love v. Pressley · 99 N.C. App. 636 - Allen v. Simmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While we are bound by the rule which denies a tenant recovery of punitive or treble damages as a result of her constructive eviction due to the exclusivity of the remedies under N.C.G.S. § 42-25.9(a), we note that such a result would appear inappropriate when it is clear that in North Carolina a landlord may be held liable pursuant to G.S. § 75-1.1 et seq., for merely failing to maintain a rental unit in fit condition. Common sense dictates that if a landlord must make necessary repairs to a rental unit in order to avoid liability for treble damages and attorney’s fees under the Unfair Trade Practices Act, see e.g., Allen [v. Simmons], 99 N.C. App. 636 , 394 S.E.2d 478 [(1990)], and Foy [v. Spinks], 105 N.C. App. 534 , 414 S.E.2d 87 [(1992)], he should not be able to actively create an uninhabitable condition in the rental unit in order to force a tenant to leave, exposing himself only to actual damages incurred by the tenant under G.S. § 42-25.9(a). By engaging in intentionally tortious conduct, he could limit his liability, unless a plaintiff elects to forego the remedies of G.S. § 42-25, and brings suit specifically pursuant to Chapter 75.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) If any lessor, landlord, or agent removes or attempts to remove a tenant from a dwelling unit in any manner contrary to this Article, the tenant shall be entitled to recover possession or to terminate his lease and the lessor, landlord or agent shall be liable to the tenant for damages caused by the tenant’s removal or attempted removal. Damages in any action brought by a tenant under this Article shall be limited to actual damages as in an action for trespass or conversion and shall not include punitive damages, treble damages or damages for emotional distress. (c) The remedies created by this section are supplementary to all existing common-law and statutory rights and remedies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “where a tenant’s evidence establishes the residential rental premises were unfit for human habitation and the landlord was aware of needed repairs but failed to honor his promises to correct the deficiencies and continued to demand rent, then such evidence would support a factual finding by the jury that the landlord committed an unfair or deceptive trade practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.