Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 NE3D 382 - Commonwealth v. Telcinord

Commonwealth v. Telcinord’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Coates v. City of Cincinnati · Commonwealth v. Freeman · Yates v. Gober

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certainly the order must mean that defendant could not be so close ... that he would be able to observe her, speak to her, or intimidate her in any way”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “requires no more knowledge than that the defendant knew of the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “when [the defendant] violated the orders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.