Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Nev. 512 - Camco, Inc. v. Baker

Camco, Inc. v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 145 Ill. App. 3d 151 - Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. Magner · Hotel Riviera, Inc. v. Torres · Southwest Gas Corp. v. Ahmad · Mattison v. Johnston · Dixon v. Thatcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within fifty miles of any area which was the 'target of a corporate plan for expansion' was unreasonable. 113 Nev. 512, 519-20 , 936 P.2d 829, 833-34 (1997). We explained”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] restraint of trade is unreasonable ... if it is greater than is required for the protection of the person for whose benefit the restraint is imposed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “as a greater restraint on trade than [was] necessary to protect [the former employer's] interests.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.