Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 NEV 897 - Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · M. Morrin & Son Co. v. Burgess Construction Co. · Commonwealth v. Allen · State v. McCorgary · Emmons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “procedure was `so unduly prejudicial as [fatally to] taint [the defendant's] conviction.' . . . [A] photographic identification must be set aside `only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.