Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Nev. 974 - Chambers v. State

Chambers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Leonard v. State (1998), Floyd v. State (2002)

26 state decisions

1001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Colorado v. Connelly · Woodson v. North Carolina · Victor v. Nebraska · Blackburn v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the youth of the accused; his lack of education or his low intelligence; the lack of any advice of constitutional rights; the length of detention; the repeated and prolonged nature of questioning; and the use of physical punishment such as the deprivation of food or sleep.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The question of the admissibility of a confession is primarily a factual question addressed to the district court: where that determination is supported by substantial evidence, it should not be disturbed on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “that his statements were not voluntarily given in light of the fact that he was questioned for four hours after having been stabbed, that he was not well rested, and that he was intoxicated.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.