State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably State v. Coyle (1990), State v. Long (1990)
102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · Enmund v. Florida · Tison v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“including motive, intent, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... [t]he danger that Evidence Rules 55 and 47 seek to prevent is that a defendant will be prejudiced by evidence of other acts such that a jury will convict because he or she is a bad person disposed to commit crime. State v. Garfole, 76 N.J. 445, 450-51 [ 388 A. 2d 587 ] (1978). [ 113 N.J. 239, 275 , 550 A. 2d 117 (1988)].”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that would have afforded the jury a rational basis”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Cooper · State v. Chew
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.