State v. Murillo’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Boyd v. United States · New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the [person] acted under the control of his private employer; (2) whether the [person's] actions clearly related to his private employer's private purposes; (3) whether the search was conducted as a legitimate means of protecting the employer's private property; and (4) whether the methods and manner of the search were reasonable and no more intrusive then necessary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Brooks · State v. Santiago“The courts of New Mexico, like other jurisdictions, have accepted the long-standing rule that the protections of the Fourth Amendment do not apply to private individuals acting for their own purposes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rivera · State v. Santiago“[s]ecurity personnel hired to protect private business premises are performing traditional police functions when they arrest, question, and search for evidence against criminal suspects.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Santiago
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.