¶1 for dismissal of appeal unless the appellant, within twenty days from service of the order upon him, file a new undertaking to the same effect as the original
¶2 All concur.
¶3 Ordered accordingly.
113 N.Y. 615
20 N.E 594
Beeman v. . Banta
Decided March 12, 1889
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1889-03-12
Motion to tiompel the appellant to file a new undertaking with sufficient sureties as required by law, on the ground that one of the sureties to the original undertaking had become insolvent, or in case of failure the appeal be dismissed. The appellant asked that in case the court decided to require a new undertaking it be simply for costs.
Decided 1889-03-12