Huyck v. . Andrews’s Empirical Analysis
1889
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 62 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently February 1996 · most notably Copeland v. McAdory (1892), Los Angeles Terminal Land Co. v. Muir (1902)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 62 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Prescott v. Trueman · Scriver v. . Smith · Kellogg v. Malin · Mott v. . Palmer · Mitchell v. Warner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Wo think the safer mle is to hold that the covenants in a deed to protect the grantee against every adverse right, interest, or dominion over the land, and that he may rely upon them for his security. If open, visible, and notorious easements are to be excepted from the operation of covenants, * * * it should he incumbent upon the grantor, if he does not intend to covenant against such defects and incumbrances, to except them from the operation, of his covenants.'’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““These reasons are not applicable to other easements, and the rule of that ease has not been applied to any other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.