113 Ohio App. 3d 109 - Rine v. Sabo’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2019
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mitseff v. Wheeler · 59 Ohio St. 3d 108 - Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd. · Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America · 61 Ohio App. 3d 127 - Lorain National Bank v. Saratoga Apartments · Paugh v. Hanks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(I) the actor either intended to cause emotional distress or knew or should have known that actions taken would result in serious emotional distress to the plaintiff; (2) the actor’s conduct was so extreme as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and was such that it can be considered utterly intolerable in a civilized community; (3) the actor’s actions were the proximate cause of plaintiffs psychic injury; and (4) the mental anguish suffered by plaintiff is serious and of a nature that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[Rjecovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress [is limited] to such instances as where one was a bystander to an accident or was in fear of physical consequences to his own person.” Rine v. Sabo, 113 Ohio App.3d 109 , 680 N.E.2d 647, 654 (1996) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“alleged failure to exercise reasonable care either (a) increased the risk of harm, or (b) induced detrimental reliance”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.