113 Ohio App. 3d 363 - Bell v. Horton’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) [n]o genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, that conclusion is adverse to that party.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Kristian v. Youngstown Orthopedic Assoc., Unpublished Decision (12-15-2004)

2. “[N]o action shall be brought * * * upon a contract or sale of lands * * * or interest in or concerning them, * * * unless the agreement upon which such action is brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, is in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith [.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Arrich v. Moody, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2005)