113 Ohio App. 3d 374 - Phillips v. Rayburn’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
104 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably 115 Ohio St. 3d 195 - State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntosh (2007), 156 Ohio App. 3d 65 - Mark-It Place Foods, Inc. v. New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. (2004)
104 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Mitseff v. Wheeler · Bostic v. Connor · Turner v. Turner · Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e ... find that the advantages gained by preclusion do not outweigh the risks inherent in allowing a criminal conviction to bind a defendant in a subsequent civil suit based on the same conduct. Procedural and discovery differences between the criminal and civil forums coupled with the defendant’s dilemma over whether to testify in his own behalf or present any defense at the criminal trial make [issue] preclusion ... a precarious and, we believe, unwise practice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(A) A person acts purposely when it is his specific intention to cause a certain result, or, when the gist of the offense is a prohibition against conduct of a certain nature, regardless of what the offender intends to accomplish thereby, it is his specific intention to engage in conduct of that nature. (B) A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(A) Scope of rule {¶ 30} "This rule governs only judicial notice of adjudicative facts; i.e., the facts of the case. {¶ 31} "(B) Kinds of facts {¶ 32} "A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonabl[y] be questioned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.