Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Ohio App. 3d 669 - Loder v. Burger

113 Ohio App. 3d 669 - Loder v. Burger’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably 120 Ohio App. 3d 192 - Doyle v. Fairfield Machine Co., Inc. (1997), Conte v. General Housewares Corp. (2000)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

1501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc. · Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical Center · Kalain v. Smith · Peyko v. Frederick · Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party has not “failed to make a good faith effort to settle” under R.C. 1343.03(C) if he has (1) fully cooperated in discovery proceedings, (2) rationally evaluated his risks and potential liability, (3) not attempted to unnecessarily delay any of the proceedings, and (4) made a good faith monetary settlement offer or responded in good faith to an offer from the other party. If a party has a good faith, objectively reasonable belief that he has no liability, he need not make a monetary settlement offer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A party has not `failed to make a good faith effort to settle' under R.C. 1343.03 (C) if he has (1) fully cooperated in discovery proceedings, (2) rationally evaluated his risks and potential liability, (3) not attempted to unnecessarily delay any of the proceedings, and (4) made a good faith monetary settlement offer or responded in good faith to an offer from the other party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If, upon motion of any party to a civil action that is based on tortious conduct, that has not been settled by agreement of the parties, and in which the court has rendered a judgment, decree, or order for the payment of money, the court determines at a hearing held subsequent to the verdict or decision in the action that the party required to pay the money failed to make a good faith effort to settle the case and that the party to whom the money is to be paid did not fail to make a good faith effort to settle the case, interest on the judgment, decree, or order shall be computed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.