113 Ohio App. 3d 696 - State v. Keaton’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hamling v. United States · Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Smith v. People of the State of California · Ginsberg v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In an obscenity trial, the trier of fact must determine, among other factors, whether the average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the work taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.