Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Ohio App. 3d 737 - State v. Wilson

113 Ohio App. 3d 737 - State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2018

13 state decisions

60199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · State v. Jenks · United States v. Turkette · State v. Long · Missouri v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that had an existence separate and apart from the corrupt activity. State v. Habash (Jan. 31, 1996), Summit App. No. 17073, unreported, 1996 WL 37752 . Rather, a defendant may be convicted of those offenses if he was employed by or associated with an entity that meets the statutory definition of an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Linkous, 08ca51 (4-22-2009)
  2. “R.C. 2923.32 (B)(1) states in pertinent part: `Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person may be convicted of violating the provisions of R.C. 2923.32 as well as of a conspiracy to violate one or more those provisions under R.C. 2923.01 .'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Sands, 2007-L-003 (12-31-2008)
  3. “any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust, union, government agency, or other legal entity, or any organization, association, or group of persons associated in fact although not a legal entity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Lowman Lumber Co., 22398 (1-9-2009)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.