Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Ohio App. 3d 88 - State v. Brooks

113 Ohio App. 3d 88 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2024

16 state decisions

601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Jenks · State v. Bradley · State v. Dehass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[p]ossess' or 'possession' means having control over a thing or substance, but may not be inferred solely from mere access to the thing or substance through ownership or occupation of the premises upon which the thing or substance is found.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'The crucial issue is not whether the accused has actual physical contact with the controlled substance but, rather, whether the accused is capable of exercising dominion and control over the substance.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Appellant, despite his handcuffs, was capable of limited movement. The jury in this case chose to believe the testimony of Officer Nachtraub that the crack appeared only after appellant had been in the cruiser. Because we can find no evidence in the record that the jury lost its way or created a miscarriage of justice, appellant's first assignment of error is found not well taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.