State v. Buehler’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Boley v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2010), Grey v. Walgreen Co. (2011)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Steele v. Morrissey · 146 Ohio St. 203 - Carter v. Division of Water · State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of Elections · Weaver v. Edwin Shaw Hospital · Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he court determines that, if DNA testing is conducted and an exclusion result is obtained, the results of the testing will be outcome determinative regarding that inmate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if a trial court decided that a DNA test exclusion result would not be outcome-determinative, the court would have no obligation to accept the application and would have no need for the prosecuting attorney to prepare and file a DNA evidence report pursuant to R.C. 2953.75 . On the other hand, if the court knows or determines that DNA material had been collected from the crime scene but that the parent sample is no longer available for testing, that determination would moot the issue of whether the test result would be outcome-determinative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a trial court should exercise its discretion * * * as to whether it will first determine whether the inmate has demonstrated that the DNA testing will be outcome-determinative, or whether it should order the prosecuting attorney to prepare and file a DNA evidence report * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.