Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 OHIOST3D 308 - Wells v. Hudson

Wells v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Smith v. Voorhies (2008), Perry v. Sloan (Slip Opinion) (2017)

26 state decisions

120200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chari v. Vore · State ex rel. Tarr v. Williams · State ex rel. Rash v. Jackson · State ex rel. Walker v. Judges, Lawrence Cty. Court of Appeals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] claim that . . . jury verdict forms did not list all the essential elements of his criminal offenses is not cognizable in habeas corpus. See, e.g., Miller v. Mitchell (Aug. 29, 1997), Trumbull App. No. 97-T-0053, 1997 WL 531303 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.