State v. Batchili’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
322 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 324 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Mays (2008), State v. Hairston (Slip Opinion) (2019)
322 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Cortez · Delaware v. Prouse · United States v. Arvizu · United States v. Sharpe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 324 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may continue beyond [the normal] time frame when additional facts are encountered that give rise to a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity beyond that which prompted the initial stop.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“The 'reasonable and articulable suspicion' analysis is based on the collection of factors, not on the individual factors themselves.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The Fourth Amendment imposes a reasonableness standard upon the exercise of discretion by government officials. Delaware v. Prouse (1979), 440 U.S. 648 , 653-654, 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 . 'Thus, the permissibility of a particular law enforcement practice is judged by balancing its intrusion on the individual's Fourth Amendment interests against its promotion of legitimate governmental interests.' Id. at 654 , 99 S.Ct. 1391 , 59 L.Ed.2d 660 . To justify a particular intrusion, the officer must demonstrate 'specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.' Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 21, 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ." State v. Batchili, 113 Ohio St.3d 403 , 2007-Ohio-2204 , 865 N.E.2d 1282 , ¶ 11. "The 'reasonable and articulable suspicion' analysis is based on the collection of factors, not on the individual factors themselves." (Emphasis sic.) Id. at ¶ 19. As the United States Supreme Court elaborated in Berkemer v. McCarty , a police officer who lacks probable cause but whose observations lead him reasonably to suspect that a particular person's behavior is criminal may detain the person briefly to investigate the circumstances that provoked the suspicion. 468 U.S. at 439 , 104 S.Ct. 3138 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317 . " '[T]he stop and inquiry must be "reasonably related in scope to the justification for their initiation." ' [ Brignoni-Ponce , 422 U.S. at 881 , 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.