Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 Okla. 199

240 P 738

West v. Michelin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 1925

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1925-10-27

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1937

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BRANSON, V. C. J.

¶1 This matter is now before this court on motion to dismiss the appeal' herein, and it appears from the record that the appeal was taken from an order dissolving an attachment. It also ap- . pears that the plaintiff, who secured the attachment, prosecuted this suit while this appeal was pending in this court, and that on the trial of his cause of action, to which the attachment was ancillary, a judgment was rendered against him, from which no appeal was perfected, and the same is now a finality.

¶2 Under this state of fa.cts, the question of the correctness of the judgment of the trial court in dissolving the attachment is moot, and for that reason, the motion to dismiss the appeal should be sustained.

NICHOLSON, C. J., and HARRISON, MASON, PHELPS, LESTER, HUNT, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.
/113/okla/199 · .json · Public domain