State v. Painter’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`(1) Does the present charged act require proof of intent? "`(2) Did the prior act require intent? "`(3) Was the victim in the prior act the same victim or in the same class as the victim in the present case? "`(4) Was the type of prior act the same or similar to the acts involved in the charged crime? "`(5) Were the physical elements of the prior act and the present act similar?'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.