Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 ORAPP 40 - State v. Person

State v. Person’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A court cannot grant a continuance pursuant to ORS 135.763(2) unless the defendant consents or the state requests one, for good cause shown. "Neither the district attorney nor the defendant requested a continuance. Therefore, under the express terms of ORS 135.763(2), the court did not have the authority to deny defendant's motion to dismiss and permit the case to go to trial." State v. Person, supra, 113 Or. App. at 43 , 831 P.2d 700 (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) The district attorney, after receiving a notice requesting trial under ORS 135.760, shall, within 90 days of receipt of the notice, bring the inmate to trial upon the pending charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is discretionary with the court. The second sentence, however, states that the trial court shall grant any continuance with the consent of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.