¶1specially concurring.
¶2I concur only because we are bound by the result oriented, prohibition era State v. Lehman, 130 Or 132, 279 P 283 (1929), and its ill-considered progeny.
113 Or. App. 627
833 P.2d 1321
Decided July 1, 1992
Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1992-07-01
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2004
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-07-01
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1specially concurring.
¶2I concur only because we are bound by the result oriented, prohibition era State v. Lehman, 130 Or 132, 279 P 283 (1929), and its ill-considered progeny.