State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Williams · Frink v. State · Demoski v. New · Millman v. State · State v. McDonald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the prosecutor does not present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury, [the grand jury] probably will not hear such evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cameron v. State“shall order such evidence to be produced and for that purpose may require the prosecuting attorney to subpoena witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cameron v. State“attempt[ ] to prevent a nighttime trespass on his property and what appeared to be a theft of his vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cameron v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.