Haas v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. City of Philadelphia · 226 Pa. Super. 381 - ELDRIDGE Et Ux. v. MELCHER · Hyndman v. Pennsylvania Railroad · 325 Pa. Super. 452 - Matsko v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOT. CO., INC. · Commonwealth v. Fox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because feasibility was not an issue raised by DOT”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.